The double up feature has been around for decades. In fact, it was much more prevalent years ago than it is currently. The following true story could be the reason why.

In April, 2009, John Kane was playing video poker in the Fremont Casino in downtown Las Vegas. A little background on Kane is in order. Kane was truly addicted to video poker. In 2006, he lost half a million dollars playing video poker at Boulder Station and earned enough Player Club points to pay for his own Game King which he set up in his home on the outskirts of Las Vegas. He had a measured temperament and was not prone to emotional outbursts. Rather his play was methodical.

On this particular day, he was playing a row of four low limit Game King machines. He had been switching between the different games available on the machines and had accumulated a decent win. When he hit the Cash Out button to take his money to a different game, the screen locked up and the light above the machine lit indicating a jackpot worth more than $1,200. Kane knew it must have been a mistake and actually told the slot attendant so. The attendant thought he was joking and paid him anyway.


Knowing there was a programming error, Kane vowed to determine how to exploit it. He called a friend, Andre Nestor who lived in suburban Pittsburg, to tell him about it. Nestor flew to Las Vegas the next day. Together they went to the Fremont to try to recreate Kane’s previous results. They were able to determine that the key to the glitch was that under the proper circumstances, the denomination could be switched retroactively making a $40 jackpot at the penny level into a $2,000 jackpot at the 50-cent level.

It took them seven hours of playing side-by-side to come up with a repeatable sequence to profit from the glitch.

Realizing they should spread their play around, they tried their technique elsewhere. They tried Game Kings at the Hilton, the Cannery, the Stratosphere, Terrible’s, Hard Rock, Tropicana, Luxor and five other casinos – all to no avail. They were not able to recreate their results at any of these other casinos.

So, they returned to the Fremont. In order to increase profits, they started using the double up feature. Ultimately casino personnel noticed the winnings. The slot manager approached Kane after one of his wins and announced he was disabling the double up feature on all Game Kings as he figured this must have something to do with his winning streak at video poker.

This didn’t bother Kane as he knew the bug, not the double up feature was the real secret of his success. To his surprise, the magic sequence no longer worked at the Fremont. That’s when he realized that the sequence worked with the double up feature turned on but it did not work with the feature turned off.

Armed with this new information, all the Game Kings in the country were their personal banks – as long as they could get the slot attendants to enable the double up feature.
 

Fast forward. As with all such situations, Kane and Nestor were ultimately caught, the machine’s erroneous code was corrected, and once again, the casinos had the upper hand.

If you are curious, here are the steps they used to “beat the house.”

The “Double Up bug” in the software of Game King video poker machines sur-vived undetect¬ed for nearly seven years, in part because the steps to repro¬duce it were so complex. This is what they did.

1. Locate a Game King video poker machine con¬figured for multi-denomination play.
2. Flag down a slot attendant and ask them to enable the Double Up option.
3. Insert money or a voucher and select the lowest denomination level offered by the machine — for example, $1 per credit on a $1, $2, $5, $10 machine.
4. Choose your favorite game — and start playing.
5. Keep playing at the minimum level until you win a big hand. An $800 royal flush is perfect.
6. With your royal flush showing but not yet cashed out, hit the More Games button on the touchscreen and select a different game variation. Play it until you score a win.
7. Insert more money or a voucher into the machine.
8. Touch the More Games button again, and change to the maximum denomination — in this case, $10 per credit. Then return to your original $800 royal flush.
9. Press the Cash Out button. “Jackpot! $8,000” will appear on the screen and the light on the top of the machine will illuminate.
10. Wait for the slot attendant to show up with an IRS form W-2G. Once you've signed it, you'll get your money.

Now that this bug has been resolved and the above 10 steps are worthless. So, let’s look at regular double up play.

HOW DOUBLE UP WORKS

The double up feature is only available after a winning hand. When made, there are different methods to play the double up feature. Some games will automatically ask if the player wants to double up. On other games a “Double Up” button will become highlighted and the player has to touch it to activate the feature.

• Once the double up feature is selected, five cards are dealt – one card face up and four cards face down.
• The object is to select a face down card that will beat the face up (or house) card.
• If the player selects a card that beats the house card, he or she will double the original win.
• If a card lower than the house card is selected, the player loses the entire win.
• If the selected card is the same rank as the house card, most games treat it as a push. However, some games will treat this as a player loss.
• It is important to ascertain whether ties are treated as pushes or losses as this greatly impacts results.

Most games allow the player to double up any winning hand – including winning double ups – but some only allow the player to double up once per initial winning hand.

Keep in mind the five cards that are dealt are chosen exactly the same way that regular video poker hands are chosen – by using the RNG (Random Number Generator). In other words, they are dealt as randomly as a machine can.

So, is the double up feature a good thing or a bad thing? Let’s try to answer – to Double Up or not to Double Up – that is the question.

Let’s look at the good first.

• Assuming that ties are treated as a push, the return for double up is 100 percent. There is no casino edge. Unless you have been able to locate a (currently extremely rare) 100+ percent game, the return for double up play is greater than the return of the base game.
• Just make sure the double up feature you are playing treats ties as a push. If not – if a tie is treated as a loss – you are facing 5.8 percent house edge. This is not playable. Avoid playing it.
• The double up feature adds some excitement to the game. A 400 credit win can become 800 credits, or 1,600 credits, or 3,200 credits or more.

Now for the bad.

• Playing the double up feature dramatically raises the game’s variance. Sure, you can win money more quickly using it, but you will also lose more quickly since half of all your double up plays will cost you your original win.
• The playing rhythm becomes interrupted when switching to double up play and back to regular play. This can have adverse effects on perfect play

Okay, there are good and bad aspects of playing double up, so let’s summarize. Here are some things to consider when deciding to play the double up feature.

• Is the return of the base game over 100 percent? If yes, do not play the double up feature.
• If the return of the base game is relatively low (95-98 percent), you may be better off looking for a higher return than playing double up in order to compensate.
• Does the double up feature treat ties as pushes or a losses? If ties are treated as losses, do not play the double up feature.
• How risk averse are you? If you have trouble watching pevious wins evaporate, do not play the double up feature.
• Do you have a substantial enough bankroll for the added variance of double up? If not, do not play the double up feature.
• Does changing the rhythm and pace of the game that happens when you switch from regular VP play to double up play bother you? If yes, do not play the double up feature.
• Does the added excitement of playing the double up feature make up for the increased variance oof double up? If so, and if you have an adequate bankroll, playing double up could be for you.

As you can see, there are many reasons to avoid playing double up and precious few supporting play. In other words, proceed cautiously with double up play.

Here are a couple of other things to consider if you decide to play double up: 

• Should you play double up on every win or less than that?
• Should you play double up more than once per win?
• Remember, every time you play double up, you increase variance. The more you play it, the larger your bankroll should be

There are a lot of things to consider, but the bottom line is playing the double up feature is a very personal decision. There are no clear cut guidelines that say a player should play it. Ultimately, it is up to the player to decide what is important and if they have what it takes to ride through the rollercoaster ride of playing the double up feature.

That’s it – everything you need to know about playing the double up feature on video poker. What is YOUR answer to the question – to double up or not to double up? Only you can say.

You can contact Jerry “Stickman” at stickmanjerry@aol.com 

The Martingale is a betting strategy that dates way back before Las Vegas and gambling was a twinkle in Benjamin “Bugsy” Siegel’s  eyes. In fact, its first documented use was well before the 18th century. It is rumored to have been started by the greedy casino owner John Martindale.

As you may have guessed the name of the Martingale system is a variation on Mr. Martindale’s surname. It is worthwhile to note that Mr. Martingale did not use the system himself, but did strongly encourage its use among his casino patrons. He would often infer to his players that other players had consistently won large sums of money using the system and, because most successful gambling systems are contrary to basic reason, they would believe him.

Here we will discuss the ups and downs of the system and, in what specific situations it can work and why. We also define and evaluate the Anti-Martingale variation of the system.

HOW THE MARTINGALE BETTING SYSTEM WORKS?

The Martingale system is one of the most popular betting strategies implemented by recreational players. This is because it has a straight forward and seemingly rational approach. Players believe in the easier the better philosophy and it is definitely that. The player does not have to memorize any complex equations or quickly and mentally calculate wager amounts. The system can be easily applied to online casinos as well as in the traditional land-based establishments.



Over the years there have several of variations on the Martingale system. All of these variations orbit around the central idea of increasing or decreasing a bet after a loss. In most cases, the system is applied to games of chance that have a near 50/50 win to loss outcomes, such as the Roulette black and red bets or the pass and don’t pass lines at the craps tables. An uncommon but definitely applicable game that the Martingale system can be applied to is Baccarat.

The traditional Martingale system simply doubles the next bet after a loss is attained. When a win is achieved a new cycle begins. The strength of the system is that the player wins the highest bet of the cycle. Consider the following case:

If a player were to start with a $1 bet and, loses that bet, their next bet would be $2 dollars, and if the player loses that bet, their next bet would be $4. If that bet is won the cycle starts over and the player starts there bet at $1 again. This approach ensures that the player will win the largest bet of each betting cycle.

At first glance and to the mathematically ill trained, the Martingale system seems to be a winning approach to games with a coin flip outcome. The novice player sees this as a sure path to easy money. But like the perception of a parking space near the door at shopping mall on the busiest shopping day of the holiday season, the Martingale is too an illusion.

The system opens up the player to an unlikely but very high-risk approach and for a very slight reward. The Martingale system plays on the statistical probabilities of chance and lures the player into a false sense of security where the approach shows that the player has very high chance of winning several small amounts and has a very low chance of losing a very large sum of money.

Because the player is winning small amounts often, the player falls into the false perception that winning more often means winning more total dollars. This is not the case. And because most of the games that Martingale method applies to are subject to the mathematical law of   trials; where this states that each event is independent of the last, there is no way for the player to feel secure in their play without some additional hedging which I’ll discuss shortly but first lets go over why it fails.

THE PROBLEMS WITH THE MARTINGALE SYSTEM

There are many problems with the Martingale system. The first concern the player needs to understand is that the longer the player plays the more likely they are to experience a bankrupting losing streak. Statistical Mathematics dictates that there is approximately a 0.001% chance of losing a 50/50 bet more than nine consecutive times.

This translates into 1 time in every 1,000 wager sequences. And because the player doubles their bet after every loss, the player loses more than1000 dollars for the 9 bet sequence. The total loss on a 1 dollar bet Martingale for a 9 bet sequence is $1059. This eliminates any gains the player would have achieved by the max bet of the cycle. In its simplest form, the betting strategy is exposing the player to exceptional losses on an average of 1 time in every 1,000 sequences.

The second and, third concerns that the player has to consider, is the constraints of the betting limits that are imposed by the casino and, the limited bankroll of the player. The betting limits of any casino ensure that the Martingale system will not be beneficial to the player. Most live roulette tables have an outside bet table max of $1000; and, after 9 bets the table max is reached. The player is prohibited by the rules of roulette from increasing their next bet.

Baccarat has some very large table limits and employing the Martingale method at these super high limits gets the player closer to an even game but ultimately a 15-20 loss streak will catch up with the player wiping out any gain achieved prior to the loss streak. But to even consider this approach an enormous bankroll has to be available for to the player.

In general cases, if a table max was reached the player, would have the option to move to a table with higher limits. The problem with this approach is that it is entirely possible that the player could continue loosing several more times.

And again after every loss the player has to double their bet. For the system to be plausible the player must possess an infinite bankroll, and the table limits must also be infinite. Both of these requirements are never the case and therefore the Martingale collapses under mathematical scrutiny.

THE ANTI-MARTINGALE SYSTEM

A popular variation of the Martingale system is the Anti-Martingale system. The premise here is to half the bet after every bet and double the bet after every win. This variation is betting on streaks but again over the long term, the player will see a steady decline of their bankroll.

Like the traditional Martingale system the law of independent trials causes this to fail. The player will eventually hit a streak where losses will eliminate all wins.

THE BEST MARTINGALE STRATEGY

In some casino games, particularly on roulette, players tend to use the Martingale Strategy. The method behind the martingale is one of the most daring gambling situations you could be involved in.

The thrill of losing it all or winning back your money (along with a small profit) has seized the emotions of casino goers for years. 

Can the Martingale Strategy Be Used Effectively?

So, what is the martingale strategy, and can it be used effectively? Before I answer these questions, I’m going to begin this section with a fictional — but nonetheless — a very human example of getting too carried away.

In his short novel ‘The Gambler’ (first published in 1866), Russian writer Fyodor Dostoevsky introduces the wealthy, arrogant Grandmother character.  Hearing a lot about casino gambling, she went to the casino in the hotel she was staying to investigate the game of roulette.

She plays roulette and wins twice betting green zero. She doubles up her money twice betting on red. However, when she later returns to the casino she gambles and loses all her winnings and a lot more of her own money.  

Dostoevsky doesn’t describe the grandmother using the martingale strategy on roulette. But the character shows the types of emotions you need to avoid because of a losing streak. 

But you may be wondering whether the grandmother might have stood a chance had she been using the martingale strategy.

What is the Martingale Strategy on Roulette Games?

What is martingale strategy on roulette games? The core idea forming the Martingale strategy on roulette games is to double your stake on an even-money wager every time you lose, until you win. If you win, the amount of net profit will be equal to your original stake. 

Most people use the Martingale strategy on even-money chances like red or black, low or high as well as evens or odds. A winning payout is 1:1.

If you win and want to continue using the martingale strategy, you start all over again from your original starting stake.

Roulette Strategy Martingale Double Downs Explained

You double your starting stake in one or more even chance roulette games until you win the equivalent value of your starting stake. This means betting double the amount of your last stake.

It’s common to lose several games in a row before winning — unless of course the Martingale sequence wipes out your bankroll or you exceed the table limit.

The house edge on single zero roulette is 2.7% or 1.35% on single zero roulette using “le partage” rule. This rule means if you lose an even-money wager because of green zero, the dealer will only take half of your stake.  

The following example shows the flow of a typical martingale strategy sequence:

1. Bet £10 and win. The total return is £20 including £10 stake. (balance = +£10)
2. In game 2, the starting stake is used again. £10. The player loses £10. (balance = £0 breakeven)
3. Player makes his first double down wagering £20 to try and recover the £10 lost in game 2, and to win £10 which is equal to the starting stake. The bet loses. (balance = -£20)
4. Player makes a second double down wagering £40 to try and recover the £30 lost in the two earlier games. The bet loses. (balance = -£60)  
5. Player makes a third double down wagering £80 to try and recover the £70 lost in the three earlier games. The bet wins. (balance = +£10) This winning bet won £80 thus recovering the £70 and producing a net profit of £10.

This looks great doesn’t it. As if there exists a perpetual money-making machine. You’d think people would be queuing for hours — if not days and nights waiting — to get into casinos to gamble. But the Martingale strategy isn’t the yellow brick road leading to a lifetime supply of—well, whatever your heart desires. 

Pros & Cons of Using the Martingale Strategy on Even-Money Roulette Games

Assuming you have a large enough bankroll, you stand a reasonably good chance of winning using the martingale strategy, so long as you don’t fall victim to a long losing streak. 

If you experience a long losing streak when using the Martingale strategy on roulette, you’ll reach a stage where the required stake exceeds the table bet size. This means you won’t be able to recover most of your losses, let alone only winning a small amount of money.

Example of a Martingale Strategy Exceeding Bet Size Limit on a Roulette Table

For instance, when using the martingale strategy on the outside even-money roulette wagers, let’s say a player’s starting stake is £10 and the table limit is £10,000.

In the following table, all martingale strategy bets lose

There are three points to bear in mind:

• Point One: The Martingale strategy risk far outweighs the reward. Consider game 10; Even if he had won, the stake is £5,120 to win a net profit of just £10. And £5,110 had already been lost by the earlier nine games. 
• Point Two: At game 11, the bet size exceeds the £10,000 table limit. Assuming the player wagers this limit and wins, he would have recovered most of his losses, less £230. So, having staked £10,000 at game 11, using the Martingale strategy, the entire sum for all games that has been staked totals £20,230.
• Point Three: If the player stakes £10,000 on game number 11, and loses, but carries on staking £10,000, this scenario (and whatever hypothetical outcomes) is outside of the rules of the martingale strategy. 

Can Skill Be Used With the Martingale Strategy on Roulette Games?

There’s no skill involved when most players use the Martingale strategy on roulette games. At best, when betting on roulette games using the Martingale strategy, players can:

• Apply bankroll stop loss rules to limit losses;
• Limit the number of double downs;
• Use a pattern selecting strategy to decide on what to bet.

To find out how you can tweak the martingale strategy so that the application is more fun and less risky, please read 888casino's Martingale strategy article.

Roulette Strategy Martingale Confusion 

The problem with the Martingale strategy is the reality of logic. The strategy is a negative progression betting strategy. 

The first stake on an outside, i.e., an even-money wager has, (because of the house edge) an almost 50:50 chance of winning. However, the second and later wagers take on the burden of the negative pressure in trying to win. 

Because the reward is low compared to the potential catastrophic losses, and because long losing streaks are common, I wouldn’t recommend roulette strategy martingale when gambling real money.

As President of the United States Donald Trump is expected to take on some tough adversaries, from the heads of other countries to special prosecutors in his own. But throughout Trump’s colorful and outrageous public life he has taken on plenty of challenges - in business, in his personal life, and even across the live tables at his casinos in Atlantic City. Sometimes he’d emerge the victor. Other times he’d lose. But occasionally, when Trump knew he didn’t stand a chance to win, he’d duck out. That’s exactly what he did when Las Vegas casino owner Bob Stupak came calling in 1989.

Bob Stupak was a classic Las Vegas story. The son of a professional gambler who ran a dice game in Pittsburgh for fifty years, the younger Stupak had a hustler’s heart. He made a fortune in the burgeoning coupon book industry in 1970s, mostly on the strength of his personality and salesmanship, selling a deal to both businesses and customers that neither likely needed. He parlayed his success into a small parcel of land north of the Las Vegas Strip that he transformed into Vegas World, a bargain-priced second-rate hotel and casino. But Stupak used his gifts for self promotion and hustling to draw outsized-attention to the under-sized property. From offering his own rules on blackjack (both dealer cards face up) to making a million dollar Super Bowl bet with another casino owner, to running for mayor of Las Vegas, Stupak knew how to get publicity for his Little Casino That Could.

As Vegas World grew throughout the 1980s, the gaming establishment began to take the upstart Stupak more seriously. When he built Vegas World in 1979 he had 100 rooms and grossed $15 million. By 1989 he had a thousand rooms and grossed $100 million a year. The slogan at Vegas World was “The Sky’s the Limit,” and Stupak put his money where his mouth was. His betting limits were $2,000, double the limit at the ritzy Caesar’s Palace on the Strip. And he was planning to literally reach into the sky with the construction of the 1,000-plus foot Stratosphere Tower.
But no matter how much success Bob Stupak had, he couldn’t seem to emerge from the shadow of another casino mogul on the East Coast, Donald Trump. Trump, too, was gifted at generating publicity for himself - and most importantly building a cult of personality around himself as a genius businessman with no equal. In 1989 Trump made Forbes’ list of the world’s billionaires for the first time, and they estimated his worth at $1.5 billion. While we now know that much of his wealth at that time came from borrowing heavily to purchase money-losing properties, at the time he looked like someone who had amassed a billion dollar fortune in less than four years. And though the following year his net worth would be estimated by Forbes at possibly zero, in 1989 he was still thought of as the country’s avatar of success, and a media darling with bestselling books, a football league, a number of properties in New York and casinos in Atlantic City with his name across the side in capital letters.

In February 1989 at a press conference at Trump Tower, Trump unveiled his latest business venture: a board game called “Trump: The Game.” The tagline for the game was “It’s not whether you win or lose, it’s whether you win!” The game would retail for $25 and Trump pledged his portion of the profits to go towards charities for AIDS research and cerebral palsy.



The game wasn’t designed by the casino mogul, but by game designer Jeffrey Breslow. Trump’s one requirement of the game was that he “didn't want a game based solely on chance. I wanted a game based on talent. And I wanted to teach people if they have business instincts. It's great if they can learn that from a game instead of having to go out and lose your shirt." Breslow and Milton Bradley did their best, creating a game that was similar to Monopoly, although much more complex, using a system of blind bidding for properties and relying less on the luck of the dice. As a consequence, the rulebook was more than 12 pages long.

When Bob Stupak heard about the game, he had an idea. He drew up a letter to Trump. The letter began: “Dear Mr. Trump, I realize how great you are. You have reminded us many times through the media and through your book, which I greatly enjoyed. And now, among your many, many endeavors, I see that you have introduced your very own game, ‘Trump: The Game.’ I have heard you quoted on television to the effect, ‘This game will show if you have it, and if you don’t, just enjoy the wife and the kids.’

Well Donald, now you’ve entered my arena…” 

The letter went on to read in all capital letters: “ONE MILLION DOLLARS SAYS I CAN BEAT DONALD TRUMP AT ‘HIS OWN GAME.’”



Stupak took the letter and sent it to the New York Times, offering to take out a full page ad to run the letter in full. The Times declined. He then went to the Wall Street Journal, who also turned him down. Finally he convinced the New York Post to run his letter as a full page ad. He also took out a page in the Atlantic City press as well, just for good measure.

After Stupak’s challenge, many of his friends in Vegas said they didn’t think Trump would even respond. So Stupak, like a true gambler, offered them to bet. He got 2-1 against and took all comers, stacking up plenty of side action to go along with the publicity his challenge was generating. Those who bet against Stupak didn’t understand Donald Trump the way Bob Stupak did. Perhaps it was because the two men were kindred spirits - larger-than-life self-aggrandizing men who let the media and the public define them. Stupak would collect from his doubters when Trump issued a statement in response to media inquiries about the challenge, a response that doubled as a dig at Stupak. “Playing a man I don’t know and haven’t heard of for $1,000,000 is a no win situation,” Trump told reporters. “It’s always possible to lose, even for someone who’s used to winning.”
 

Stupak’s response? “Well if he doesn’t know me and hasn’t heard of me, he must have been living in Russia.” And he had a point. It was unlikely Trump didn’t know about Bob Stupak. Like Trump, Stupak put his name across the top of his hotel in big lights. He made his business more about himself and his personality than anything else. When Stupak was asked if his challenge was an attempt to ride on Trump’s coattails he showed just how much the two men were cut from the same cloth when he said “I’m not looking to ride on Donald Trump. I’m giving him an opportunity to ride on my reputation,” a Trumpian answer if there ever was one.

Not to be deterred, Stupak pressed on with his challenge. He produced his own board game called “Stupak: The Ultimate Game of Skill and Chance.” He offered Trump a new bet: Trump wouldn’t have to put up a penny, and Stupak would put up $250,000 and the winner of the game could decide which charity Stupak would give it to. Stupak chose Las Vegas disability services non profit Opportunity Village. “I read that things are a bit tight at your place,” Stupak wrote in reference to massive losses reported at Trump’s Atlantic City properties, “so I’ll put up all the money. Surely you can spare a few hours away from your lawyers for a friendly game when your favorite charity (or mine) will be the big winner.”



Again Trump rebuffed Stupak’s challenge, though this time it was a bit harder. The public clamored for Trump to accept. After all, he had nothing to lose and it would all go to charity. Opportunity Village sent a telegram to Trump asking him to please accept.

One issue at play beneath the surface of this gambit by Bob Stupak was that Donald Trump had been making statements about moving into Las Vegas and developing property there. “Donald says he wants to come to Las Vegas,” Stupak said at the time. “If he does, then he should come out and get involved in the community. I hope he accepts the challenge this time, because it’s for a worthwhile cause.”

Trump never responded, but Stupak had won plenty. He got his name in papers from coast to coast. He made himself look more outlandish and bold than his rival. He earned some respect from the Las Vegas community. And he had people talking about Vegas World and Bob Stupak once again.

Trump: The Game, meanwhile, was a flop. Milton Bradley had hoped to sell two million units in the first year. It sold only 800,000. People were reluctant to purchase a game from a real-life billionaire and line his pockets. So Milton Bradley re-cut the commercial and added in a voiceover declaring that Trump’s proceeds from the game were going to charity. It didn’t help. The truth was that the game was overly-complicated and not very fun. Why would people want to play Trump: The Game when they could play Monopoly?

Years later when talking about the challenge with his biographer, Las Vegas Review columnist John Smith, Stupak admitted that he never even read the rules of Trump: The Game. If he had, he’d have noticed that the game requires at least three players. It’s not even possible to play it heads-up. For all his carping about why he couldn’t accept Stupak’s challenge, Trump never even mentioned this important, disqualifying point. Perhaps Trump, too, didn’t even know how to play his own game.

 I think I speak for all of us when I say that I would rather enjoy family dinners in casinos than at the homes of relatives. Considering that I sometimes find myself joining in on those very sorts of meals in London, a long way from my base in the United States, I feel that it’s only fair for me to have a say in where we do the dining. But, as I’ve found, it’s tough to corral my loved ones and convince them that we should caravan to, say, Crockford’s, in order to break things up with sessions of craps, roulette and blackjack between courses. It simply never works.

Recently, though, I’ve discovered that it’s easy enough to bring casinos to the homes of family members, which makes going all the way to England for familial gatherings all the  more agreeable. I live in New York and Elite Lounge Live Casino — the latest iteration of online gaming, with live dealers sliding out cards, spinning roulette wheels and tossing dice — is not yet authorized there. But that doesn’t stop me from toting along my laptop and playing in England, a long hop across the Atlantic Ocean, where online gaming is totally legal.

Most importantly, while there, I am not risking my money with a fly-by-night operation. Elite Lounge Live Casino is put on by one of the world’s most highly regarded online casino giants, 888 Casino. The company has been in business since 1997, maintains a stellar reputation and its sharply designed logo adorns the shirts of countless World Series of Poker superstars. So I am sold on the legitimacy of it all. Plus what the dealers are doing is plain to see. That seriously boosts my confidence — and enjoyment.



Apparently, I am not the only one who feels this way — about the honesty and aesthetics of Elite Lounge Live Casino. “It looks like our members appreciate the investment and the attention to detail we put into this top-end environment,” Itai Pazner, 888’s COO. “As far as feedback from our customers, they have recognized that we have provided them with a unique environment that has shattered the barrier between land-based casinos and the online live casinos.”

Blackjack stands firmly as my casino game of choice and, via Elite Lounge and Live Casino, it plays much like the versions in brick-and-mortar properties. Rather than putting me up against a random number generator, which always starts with fresh decks of virtual cards, Live Casino allows me to play against real dealers who deal actual cards out of a regulation shoe.

As in traditional casinos, the tables at Live Action feature six-decks of cards that get reshuffled at various points. So when I get dealt, say, an Ace, 8 of spades (soft 19), I know that those cards are out of the game until the next shuffle. There is also a sense of elegance, similar to what can be found in the high-end gaming enclaves of casinos such as Venetian and Palazzo in Macau and Las Vegas. “We definitely took inspiration from this world in creating our Elite Lounge,” confirmed Pazner.



Contributing to the reality of it all, there’s socializing at the table — chatting it up with other players via messaging —  and the rest of my family members can’t help but join in, busting out their devices and putting up their money. It’s the next best thing to being in a casino and a far cry from the online gambling of yore, where you played against invisible technology.

The well-dressed dealers — men wear suits; women show up decked-out in finery that’s sexy enough to catch your eye but not so revealing that you lose focus on your cards — are hooked up with microphones and can actually talk to players at the tables. So they totally keep it real, as do the ambient casino sounds. You hear cards being shuffled, people chattering away, chips riffling. And you can play new, innovative games that include Speed Roulette and Dream Catcher (one more new-comer, Double-Ball Roulette, is in the offing). “888 Casino understands that it is important to provide tailored experiences that meet the various preferences and demands of [our] players,” Guy Cohen, VP B2C at 888.

As far as I’m concerned, he’s right. Once logged in and set up with chips, I feel like I am playing at my local gambling joint. All I need is for somebody to bring me cocktails.

However, it wasn’t until I did a bit of snooping around that I discovered why the online environment seems so authentic: it is actually a real casino in Malta. No wonder it all feels so true to life.

Clearly, little has been spared in making Elite Lounge & Live Casino into the best possible experience for the players. In some regards, it is actually better than being in the kind of casino to which you travel. The visuals here are all high-definition and the the roulette games alone are outfitted with 15 or so cameras. The beauty part there is that they allow you to watch the game from various angles and even to slow down the movement of the ball so that you can view it in slow motion.



To my mind, that feature accomplishes two things: For one, you can milk the moment by observing the ball making its turns in tiny increments. This is the roulette equivalent of slowly turning up a card at blackjack or poker — what gamblers call “sucking it” — so as to slowly reveals suit and value. Furthermore, making the circle in slow motion provides incontrovertible proof that the game is completely legitimate. There is nothing happening that is  too fast for the naked eye to see. Even the fanciest casinos on the Vegas Strip can’t do that for you.

What you don’t see when you play Live Casino is how it all happens. For that, a trip behind the scenes and to the actual location is required. Dealers there are all trained not only to divvy out cards like the pros that they are but also to communicate clearly with players. It all goes down in a manner that seems completely in line with the way thing transpire in the physical casino of your choice.

Because the Elite Lounge Live Casino experience comes to your location from an actual gaming floor in Malta, you play alongside gamblers who walked into the brick-and-mortar casino. It gets no realer than that. High tech, well lit, shot with the best camera gear out there, the experience is completely transporting. There is even a Grand VIP table where you can play for stakes as high as 10,000-pounds per hand. However, that game is a little rich for my blood, so it’s also nice to be able to play for as little as 50p.

It all adds up to the perfect combination of real-world casino play, complete with action and interaction, and the online casino option, which feels as convenient as ordering in dinner from your local burger joint. Best of all, for me, until 888’s Elite Lounge Live Casino comes to New York, it’s one more reason to visit the relatives in England. Considering the real-life backdrops of Elite Lounge Live Casino, playing on the site brings a sense of exoticism to the proceedings. As Pazner put it, “The unique build of the environment allows us to transport our players to the top casino locations around the world.”

And, clearly, I’d rather be there than in a relative’s dining room.

I usually get an email or phone call a few times each month from a blackjack player who asks me the following question: “Your article said to stand on (a specific hand). I’ve read in a book (or on the Internet) that you should hit that hand. Who’s right?”

The reason you might see someone say or write something different from what I wrote is because the playing strategy for some hands will change depending upon the number of decks being used and/or the mix of playing rules. (This is why I always include the number of decks and pertinent playing rules whenever I discuss a playing strategy.) To give you some examples of what I mean, take a look at the following blackjack hands and decide how to play them for two sets of different rules.

Note: I’ll use the following abbreviations:
h17 = dealer must hit soft 17
s17 = dealer must stand on soft 17
das = player may double down after pair splitting
ndas = player may not double down after pair splitting

A-8 VS. DEALER 6

1. Six-deck game s17
2. Six-deck game h17

In a multi-deck blackjack game with h17, you need to be more aggressive and double down on soft 19 against a dealer 6 rather than stand (which is the correct strategy for s17). The major contributor as to why doubling down is better is because when the dealer must hit soft 17, is because she will bust more often compared to when she must stand on soft 17.  (Note: There are other contributing factors but this is the main one.)

A-7  VS. DEALER 2

1. Double-deck game, h17
2. Double-deck game, s17

When the live blackjack dealer has to hit soft 17, a player needs to be more aggressive and double down on soft 18 against dealer 2 for the same reason as the above hand. (Betting  more by doubling when the blackjack dealer’s chances of busting increases with h17 rule.)

7-7 VS. DEALER 10

1. Six-deck game, h17
2. Single-deck, 17

In a six- (and double-) deck blackjack games, the correct strategy is to hit your pair of 7s (and hope you draw a 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7). (You’ll lose less in the long run by hitting, compared to splitting.) In a single-deck game, the better play is to stand (rather than hit). The logic for standing is you have removed from play two 7s (the cards in your hand) making the likelihood of drawing a third 7 (for a 21), and beating a potential blackjack dealer’s 20, slim. This shifts the odds in favor of standing vs. hitting. (The effect of card removal is more pronounced with a single deck as opposed to, say, six decks. Thus you are less likely to draw a third 7 in a single-deck game as opposed to a six-deck game where there could be as many as twenty-two more 7s remaining in the unplayed cards.) (Note: Surrender is not common in single-deck games; however, if it were offered, the better play when dealt a pair of 7s against a dealer’s 10 upcard in a single-deck game is to surrender the 7s.)

6-3 VS. DEALER 2

1. Double-deck game, h17
2. Six-deck game, s17

In a six-deck game, you should hit 9 against a dealer 2. (You double only when the blackjack dealer shows a 3 through 6 upcard). In a double-deck game, you should double down on your 9 against a dealer’s 2 upcard. (You double 9 against a dealer’s 2 through 6 upcard.) The logic for doubling against a dealer 2 in a double-deck game is because the fewer the number of decks of cards, the more you don’t want to draw the cards that you hold in your hand when you double down.  Since you’ve removed two small-value cards that make up your 9 (which you don’t want to draw when doubling), this makes doubling a better play over hitting in a double-deck game.

6-5 VS. ACE

1. Six-deck game, s17
2. Double-deck game, s17

In a six-deck game with s17, the correct strategy is to hit against a dealer’s A. (The rule is to double down your 11 if the blackjack dealer shows 10 or less; otherwise hit, meaning you hit against a dealer A.) In a double-deck game with s17, the optimal play is to always double down on 11 (even when the blackjack dealer shows an A). (The logic for doubling 6-5 in a double-deck game is the same as for the previous hand; namely, you’ve removed two cards that you don’t want to get on the draw, which is a more pronounced effect in a double-deck than for a six-deck game.)

10-7 VS. ACE

1. Six-deck game, h17, surrender.
2. Six-deck game, s17, surrender.

In a six-deck game, you should stand on hard 17 vs. A, with s17. However, if the rules specify h17, then the correct play is to surrender your hard 17 against dealer ace. Logic: When the blackjack dealer hits her soft 17, she is more likely to end up with a total greater than 17, and correspondingly, less likely to end up with 17 that would push your 17.  The removal of a potential push with the h17 rule increases the expectation of losing to the point that surrendering your 17 becomes a better play. (Meaning, you’ll lose slightly more than 50% of your bet in the long run if you stand with the h17 rule, making surrender, where you lose exactly 50% of your bet, the better option.)

The point I‘m trying to make with the above sample hands is this: the basic playing strategy is dependent on the number of decks of cards being used and the mix of playing rules. If you want to play every hand accurately (and I hope you do), then you should use the basic playing strategy that corresponds to the number of decks of cards and mix of playing rules in whatever game you intend to play.

You’ll find 12 accurate, color-coded, basic playing strategy charts covering single-, double-, and multi-deck games with different playing rules in Chapter 3 of my Ultimate Blackjack Strategy Guide.

“Have you ever caught anyone card counting?” As a croupier, working in London’s high end casinos, this was one of the questions I was asked most – often by people who’d never been to a casino, who wouldn’t even know how to play blackjack. The notoriety of this form of cheating is probably due at least in part to Ben Mazrich’s bestselling account of a group of card counting students who won millions in Vegas. Mazrich’s 2002 book, Bringing Down the House: The Inside Story of Six M.I.T. Students Who Took Vegas for Millions, was followed by 21, a 2008 film adaptation starring Kevin Spacey as the Svengali behind the students’ Vegas trips.

In the story (billed as non-fiction, but possibly embellished) the students work as a team, with some taking the role of "spotters" who place the minimum bet and keep track of the count, while others take on the role of big players who come over and place large bets when the spotters send them a signal that the count is in the players’ favour. 

Had I read the book? I was often asked. Had I seen the film, and was it really like that? Actually no. A bunch of chancers working together would have stood out a mile in a small private members’ club in London. In one casino I worked in, the main gaming floor offered just two roulette tables, and two card tables – only one of which was blackjack. Membership was granted to such a select few that staff often outnumbered players by about ten to one, so there was no chance of a rogue group of con artists slipping in and getting a card counting scam going.

Players sometimes tried card counting, but the fact is, it’s pretty tricky to make a success of it. So although we were trained to spot card counting, it wasn’t considered an issue as long as the players were losing. In over a decade, I only knew two players to be barred for it, and that was because they were winning consistently – the card counting itself wasn’t really the concern.

In fact, the most common form of cheating on blackjack can simply be summed up as “lying.” Here are the top five ways I saw players lie in an attempt to win more money on blackjack:
 

BLACKJACK CHEAT #1: PRETENDING THEY DIDN’T WANT A CARD

In its most basic form, this means a player asking for a card, then claiming they didn’t want it, if the card makes their hand go bust. Players will try this even if they’ve clearly tapped their box for a card, or verbally asked for one – or a combination of both. They then expect the dealer to take back the card they’ve now decided they don’t want. As outrageous as this may sound, it should be no surprise if you’ve read my recollections of how players in Mayfair cheat on roulette.

A variation of this is waiting to see what the live blackjack dealer gets, then deciding they didn’t want the card they’d asked for. In one case, a guy who was always cheating got a three when he asked for a card. I then drew a ten, on the ten I had already – this made twenty, which beat both his hands. I took the losing bets, put away the cards and only then, when he’d had time to consider it, did he claim he hadn’t wanted a card. His rationale was that if I took the three, then drew the ten, I’d go bust with 23, and he’d be paid on both boxes. And as so often happens in Mayfair, he got away with it.
 

BLACKJACK CHEAT #2: PRETENDING THEY HAD WANTED A CARD 

This is my friend Jack’s pet hate. He says, “the worst thing is when they have something like 17, and of course they don’t want a card. But say the dealer has a ten, then they pull an Ace – so the dealer has blackjack – suddenly the player claims they wanted a card on 17!”
 

BLACKJACK CHEAT #3: PRETENDING THEY’D WANTED TO DOUBLE 

So in this instance, a player asks for a card, then when it turns out to be a good one, they’ll claim they wanted to double their initial bet. Of course, they haven’t asked to double, or put out the money to double, or given any indication that they want to double – because of course this is only something they’ve only decided afterwards once they’ve seen the card!
 

BLACKJACK CHEAT #4: BETTING OVER OR UNDER THE TABLE MINIMUM

Players sometimes deliberately bet over or under the table minimum, in the hope that the dealer won’t notice, and that they’ll be able to turn that to their advantage. If they bet below the table minimum and the bet loses, they’ll declare it was a “no bet” and ask for their money back, on the grounds that you shouldn’t have allowed it. If it wins, they’ll want to be paid as if they’d bet the higher amount that meets the table minimum. Conversely, if a player bets over the maximum, and it loses, they’ll want the difference back!
 

BLACKJACK CHEAT #5: SLIPPING IN THE “WRONG” CHIP

If a player changes their bet, it’s best to verbally check they meant to do that, because even if it meets the table’s minimum and doesn’t exceed the maximum, the player will still try to turn it to their advantage if you don’t comment on it. So if they’ve been betting £300 a box on blackjack, eg three chips at a value of £100 each, then they bet £225 eg two chips at £100 and one chip at £25 (especially if the £25 chip is at the bottom), you need to check that’s what they intended to bet, before dealing the hand. Because if that box wins, they’ll claim that they meant to bet £300, and they’d put the £25 chip down by mistake – they’ll then expect to be paid as if they’d bet £300. 

And of course if the player bets more than their usual bet, there’s an angle here too! So say they’d been playing £75 a box, eg three chips at a value of £25 each, then they put down £150 eg two chips at a value of £25 and one chip at a value of £100 (especially if the £100 chip is on the bottom) - if that box loses, then rather than losing £150, they’ll want £75 back, arguing that they’d never usually bet £150 and they put the £100 chip down by mistake. If they’re really cheeky, they may even argue that they want the whole bet back because they never bet that much, and “you should have checked!”

Samantha Rea is a London based journalist and former croupier. 

Perhaps it is no coincidence that Las Vegas is located only 277 miles away from Hollywood. The short drive across the desert or one-hour flight via private jet provides easy access to casino tables for celebrities who look as striking on casino surveillance monitors as they do on the big screens where they prefer to be seen.

Not surprisingly, the biggest names are drawn to the hottest casinos. Spots like Bellagio, Wynn, Hard Rock, Venetian and Cosmopolitan all rank as magnets for Tinsel Town VIPs who like to get down. And it’s no wonder that they do.

The best casinos make ordinary people feel like movie stars. When bonafide stars roll in, with their deep pockets and recognizable faces, gambling bosses pay special attention. “Celebs love coming to Vegas because the casinos are very accommodating,” Howard Lefkowitz, president of Vegas.com, told Forbes. “They can have a spectacle or be shielded from the public eye.”

BEN AFFLECK

Sometimes, though, the stars are not quite as appreciated as you would think. Such was the case with Ben Affleck, who learned to count cards and managed to bring down the house at the Hard Rock in Vegas.

Things ended for him in the same way that they end for most any advantage player, famous or not. A casino security guy tapped him on the shoulder and, according to Variety, said, “You’re too good at this game.” If it’s any consolation, he can heed the words of Bill Benter, formerly a card counter and now one of the world’s most successful horse betters. As the legendary gambler once told me, “If the casinos are not chasing you out, you’re doing something wrong.”

That said, Affleck’s back-off must have annoyed at least one group: dealers, pit-bosses and cocktail waitresses. During a particularly lucky night at the tables, he managed to rake in  $145,000 and showed his appreciation by giving it all away to casino employees.

BRUCE WILLIS

Bruce Willis, on the other hand, seems more than welcome on casino gaming floors. It doesn’t hurt he has reportedly been down some $100,000 at a Palms craps table. That he once snagged $500,000 playing baccarat in Atlantic City seems to bother no one.

Most recently, on the night of the Floyd Mayweather vs Conor McGregor fight, Willis, wearing a black leather jacket with a matching tee shirt emblazoned with the words New York City, was rolling the bones at MGM Grand. But that’s nothing new for the man made famous by “Die Hard.” Back in 2003, soon before he blew minds as a mob-burning boxer in “Pulp Fiction,” a fan spotted him at the Route 66 Casino in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Willis’s side-gigging band had just finished a set at the second-tier gambling den and he bought in for $5,000 at the craps table. The star ran his stake up to $9,000 and ultimately cashed out for $25,000 – which may be more than his short-lived band received for playing at this small-town joint.

JOHN CUSACK

Another craps lover? John Cusack who’s next appearing as a vengeful white-collar criminal in the movie “Blood Money.” When it comes to casino action, he’s been heard to say, “A hot hand with dice is my idea of heaven. I can’t describe it. Anyone who thinks gambling isn’t for them would instantly change if they caught a winning streak playing craps.”

DEADMAU5

Famous nightclub DJ deadmau5 can surely relate. He embraces the risk of casino gambling and, perhaps, whenever he buys in, the mega-gambler/mega-partier Don Johnson ought to get a cut. “Deadmau5 wasn’t a gambler until he started playing blackjack with me,” Johnson relates “I was in a casino nightclub with Matt Bon Jovi [brother of rocker Jon Bon Jovi]. We went backstage to chat with deadmau5 and kicked around some stuff music-wise. I told [deadmau5] that if he has time after the show, he should join us for blackjack. He said he didn’t play, so I posted up his first few bets and they happened to hit. I gave him a free roll. It’s easy to enjoy blackjack that way.” Considering it all, Johnson remembers, “He wound up having a big night at the table and he’s been playing ever since.”

According to a story in Rolling Stone, deadmau5, these days, has gotten over any qualms about putting his own cash at risk. In describing his post-show activities, the magazine reports him making “a trip to the blackjack table where he was down nearly $100,000 before winning it back in 20 minutes and winning $50,000 more.”

DREW CAREY

Sometimes, when it comes to celebrity gambling, it takes two to tango. TV star Drew Carey and the late “Simpsons” co-creator Sam Simon were hanging out together in Las Vegas. Both of them enjoy gambling and decided to indulge in that pursuit while waiting for lunch at Mandalay Bay (a hamburger for Carey, a veggie burger for Simon). Betting $1,000 a hand as their meals were being prepared, the pair managed to drop $200,000 or so between them. But Carey doesn’t mind gambling alone either – and having fun in the process. One anecdote has him playing blackjack for $500 per hand and trying to double down with a bobble head doll of himself.

CHARLIE SHEEN

That was entertaining, but, for Charlie Sheen, gambling has been anything but the stuff of amusement. During his divorce with Denise Richards, it came out that he was blowing $200,000 a week playing games of chance. En route to the hospital, for the birth of their child, Richards claimed, Sheen placed a call to his bookie to bet on a sporting event. Supposedly, he’s since given up on gambling for good. Maybe, though, he was just approaching it the wrong way. Sheen’s brother Emilio Estevez made the most of his gambling by serving as the big player for the blackjack team run by Rob Reitzen, one of the most successful gamblers in history.

Of course, though, few things would be more memorable than sitting at a blackjack table with Sheen and hearing him shout his oft voiced “Winning!” every time an ace and picture card came his way. Surely that’d earn the star a steak dinner and cement his status as a Sin City legend.

In this article you will learn how to play a hard 16 when you play blackjack.

A hard 16 is a blackjack hand that contains either no Aces, or if an Ace is present, it counts as one. Some examples of hard 16 are:

• 10-6
• 7-9
• 4-4-8
• 7-8-A

HARD 16 PLAYING OPTIONS

There are three viable options: hit, stand, or surrender. Which strategy you invoke depends on what the dealer’s upcard is and the rules of the game.

HARD 16 BASIC PLAYING STRATEGY

The following generic basic playing strategy summarizes how to play your hard 16 without regard to the actual cards that comprise your hand.

• In a single- and double-deck game, surrender against a dealer’s 10 or Ace upcard, stand against a dealer’s 2 through 6 upcard, and hit against a dealer’s 7, 8, or 9 upcard.
• In a multi-deck game, surrender against a dealer’s 9, 10, or Ace upcard, stand against a dealer’s 2 through 6 upcard, and hit against a dealer’s 7 or 8 upcard.
• If the surrender option is not allowed, then hit your hard 16 instead.

HARD 16 ADVANCED PLAYING STRATEGY

A more advanced blackjack strategy with extra precision considers the composition of cards that make up your 16. For example, if your 16  is comprised of three (or more) cards, say 5 plus 6 plus 5, it is played differently than if it is comprised of, say, a 10 plus 6. The composition-dependent strategy is as follows:

• If your hard 16 is comprised of three (or more) cards, in all cases, you should follow the above strategy for hard 16 with this exception:
  • Stand on 16 (instead of surrendering) against a dealer’s 10 upcard.
• In a single-deck game with s17, hit a 9 plus 7 against a dealer’s Ace upcard (instead of surrender). 

Additionally, if the hard 16 is the result of a pair split, then stand (instead of hit).

REASON FOR THE STRATEGY

A hard 16 is one of the worst hands you can get when you play blackjack because you will lose more hands than you win no matter what strategy you invoke. However, you can minimize your losses if you follow the previous playing strategy.

The reason you should surrender a hard 16 is when your chance of winning is less than one out of four hands, i.e., your expected loss is worse than 50%. This means that statistically, if playing the hand has less than a 25 percent chance of winning and consequently greater than a 75 percent chance of losing, you will save money in the long run by surrendering the hand instead. This is the case with surrendering hard  16 per the previous strategies.

The reason you stand on hard 16 when the dealer’s upcard is small (namely 2 through 6) is because the dealer’s chances of busting are relatively high (35 to 42%). In this situation, you don’t want to risk busting your hard 16 hand by drawing another card because you automatically lose even if the live blackjack dealer subsequently busts in the same round.

When the dealer’s upcard is 7 through Ace, the probability of the dealer’s busting is lower, and she or he is more likely to make a pat (17 through 21) hand. In this situation, you are better off hitting 16 (if surrender is not a viable option), even at the risk of busting, since you will lose less in the long run (compared to standing).

In the case of a multi-card 16, you should stand instead of hit against a dealer’s 10 upcard because of these reasons:

• By having just one small-value card in your hand when you hold , say a 4 plus 6 plus 6, you increase the chances that the dealer will bust with a hit just enough to tip the balance in favor of standing (rather than hitting).
• You also decrease your own chances of filling the hand with a hit, since you already hold two cards that you’d like to get when you hit.

SUMMARY

Keep these rules in mind before surrendering, hitting, or standing on a hard 16 and you will always lose less in the long run.

For a complete basic playing strategy for any given mix of playing rules, consult Chapter 3 in the Ultimate Blackjack Strategy Guide.

If you are like most video poker players, you do not expect a lot when you are dealt nothing but a low pair for your initial hand. It seems like these hands never turn into winners. But, is that really the case? If a low pair is such a bad initial hand. If they are, why do they end up so high on playing strategy charts?

Let us take a look at what you can really expect when you are dealt a low pair and how to play video poker with that kind of hand. A full pay (9 for 1 for a full house, 6 for 1 for a flush) Jacks or Better game is used for the example, but other games have similar results. In order to be accurate with the results, we need to make sure the hands being considered have only a low pair. The information shown below is based on a hand with a low pair only and no possibility of a straight or flush.

Let us look at the following sample hand. The initially dealt hand consists of the 6 of clubs, 6 of diamonds, king of diamonds, 8 of hearts, 2 of spades.



Note that any hand with a low pair and no shot at a flush or straight produces exactly the same results.

The highest return of any possible hold comes from holding the two 6’s.



The return for this hold is 4.1184 credits based on an initial five credit bet. That is better than an 80 percent return. While the return varies with other games and pay tables, a low pair does have a fairly decent return in any non-wildcard game.

But, what makes up the return of 4.1184 credits? How many different hands are possible and how is that return spread over those hands?

These are all very good questions. Here is the breakdown.

Let us take a look at all the possible hands when holding just a low pair. The table below shows the number of occurrences, the percentage of that occurrence and the return rate for each possible resulting hand.

Notice that a player loses a bit more than 71 percent of the time. What do video poker players remember? Actually, what does any gambler remember? They remember big wins. They remember royal flushes. Unfortunately a held low pair will never become a royal flush.

So, other than big wins, what do gambles remember?

Video poker players also remember losses. With a low pair, this means they remember the over seven losses out of every 10 hands. What they remember is not the minor winning hands, it is the hand after hand that ends up as a loss.



While it may seem like more than seven losses out of every 10 hands, if you keep good records of your actual results over several thousand hands, you will find the results would be fairly close to the 70 percent losing hand rate.

So why is a low pair rated so high in the returns and strategy?

The table shows that every winning hand returns a profit to the player, not just the return the initial bet that often happens with a high pair. Not only that, but sometimes the profit is considerable.

Additionally, while this table represents the game of Jacks or Better; had the game been Double Double Bonus Poker, there would have been additional lines for 4 Aces with a 2, 3, or 4; 4 Aces; 4 2s, 3s, or 4s, with an Ace, 2, 3, or 4; 2 2s, 3s, 4s, and 4 5s thru Kings. The frequency and percentage of these additional hands would have been lower, but the return would have been higher – dramatically higher in some cases (4 aces with a kicker of 2, 3, or 4 returns 400 for 1). Had the game been Triple Double Bonus, the return for 4 aces with a kicker would have been 800 for one – the same return as a royal flush!



While it is true that a low pair will most often return nothing (more than seven out of 10 times), making it seem that one never wins with it, at times the win can be very healthy (up to 800 for 1 in Triple Double Bonus Poker). This explains its fairly high position in returns and strategy. The winning hands may not be very frequent, but they can pay extremely well.

Remember also, in the game of Jacks or Better, the actual return for an initial hand of a low pair is 82 percent. While this number includes the fairly infrequent full house and four of a kind hands, it is still a very decent return – better than most of the holds on a strategy chart.



While a high pair will guarantee you at least the return of your initial bet, you will always improve upon a 1-for-1 return when you win after holding a low pair. Maybe this type of thinking can help you get through that miserable 71+ percent loss rate of low pair hands.